WEBVTT NOTE Brussels Live. Transcribed and translated automatically from the original sound. Mistakes are possible. Independent service, not affiliated with the European Parliament or the European Commission. Source: © European Union. AI-generated: Transcripts, translations and summaries on this site are generated automatically by AI: speech recognition (Soniox), machine translation and summaries (Mistral AI). Not edited by humans before publication. EU AI Act, Article 50. 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.917 Hello and a very warm welcome to our midday meeting. 00:00:03.969 --> 00:00:08.404 Before taking your questions, we have a few announcements for you. 00:00:08.487 --> 00:00:14.328 And let us start with President von der Leyen's agenda for next week. 00:00:14.451 --> 00:00:22.225 So, on Monday, the President will receive CEOs of European start-ups and sustainable 00:00:22.308 --> 00:00:27.044 development actors at a working dinner here in Parliament. 00:00:27.154 --> 00:00:35.145 On Tuesday, the President will deliver a speech on the occasion of the Win-Win 00:00:35.285 --> 00:00:41.902 summit. here in Brussels. And on Wednesday, the President will chair the meeting of 00:00:41.957 --> 00:00:46.254 the College of Commissioners, also in Brussels. 00:00:46.355 --> 00:00:50.510 So that is the President's agenda for now. 00:00:50.601 --> 00:00:57.635 as for next week. And I would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that 00:00:57.718 --> 00:01:04.701 a press conference will be held with President von der Leyen and the President of 00:01:04.778 --> 00:01:12.658 the European Council, Mr Coste, and the Prime Minister of Canada, Mr Carney, which 00:01:12.751 --> 00:01:20.173 will take place will be held in Montreal later in the day, as part of the European 00:01:20.252 --> 00:01:27.852 Union-Canada summit. The press conference is scheduled for around 5.15 p.m. 00:01:27.929 --> 00:01:37.797 Brussels time this afternoon. And you will be able to follow it live on EBS. 00:01:37.910 --> 00:01:45.502 And now, I would like to call on Anouar to join me. 00:01:45.582 --> 00:01:51.932 Sad news concerning Eaufore, Altea, and Anouar will explain what Eaufore and Altea 00:01:52.009 --> 00:01:54.225 are and why they are indeed sad news. 00:01:56.205 --> 00:01:57.405 Thank you, Paola. 00:02:00.465 --> 00:02:06.458 Indeed. Last evening, on the evening of the 29th of October, an Italian helicopter 00:02:06.525 --> 00:02:13.775 from our EU force in Bosnia and Herzegovina, EU4 Altea, which serves every day to 00:02:13.833 --> 00:02:19.861 support peace and stability in Bosnia and Herzegovina, crashed while conducting 00:02:19.940 --> 00:02:26.201 routine training. As a result of this accident, EU4 Altea suffered the loss of four 00:02:26.265 --> 00:02:30.978 persons on board, with another 11 injured, currently in a stable condition and 00:02:31.069 --> 00:02:37.425 receiving medical treatment. The European Union is deeply saddened by this tragic 00:02:37.545 --> 00:02:44.832 loss of life. We extend our deepest condolences to the families and friends of those 00:02:44.881 --> 00:02:48.814 who lost their lives in the service of peace. 00:02:48.945 --> 00:02:53.678 The high representative yesterday has conveyed her heartfelt condolences to the 00:02:53.745 --> 00:02:58.591 Italian ministers for foreign affairs and defense. 00:02:58.785 --> 00:03:04.185 Europe stands in full solidarity with Italy in this difficult time. 00:03:05.685 --> 00:03:12.465 Thank you, Anouar. And our thoughts and sentiments are with the family and the 00:03:12.525 --> 00:03:19.627 friends of all those who lost their lives in service in this tragic accident. 00:03:19.725 --> 00:03:28.365 Now, I would like to invite Eva to share some updates on our efforts to improve 00:03:28.467 --> 00:03:31.725 European disaster preparedness. Eva. 00:03:35.685 --> 00:03:40.799 Good afternoon, everybody. Let me change the topic and let's speak about wildfires, 00:03:40.898 --> 00:03:45.438 floods, extreme weather, health emergencies. 00:03:45.525 --> 00:03:49.390 All this is Europe facing more frequently. 00:03:49.485 --> 00:03:52.678 The crises are more destructive and more complex. 00:03:52.785 --> 00:03:56.103 Climate change is accelerating these risks. 00:03:56.205 --> 00:04:03.271 And these crises do not respect borders. And no country, however well-prepared, can 00:04:03.367 --> 00:04:07.901 face every threat alone. Europe makes a difference. 00:04:07.965 --> 00:04:12.022 With disaster strikes, countries can count on each other. 00:04:12.105 --> 00:04:16.730 We saw this again this summer when firefighters and aircraft crossed borders to 00:04:16.823 --> 00:04:24.231 battle devastating wildfires. In Europe, European solidarity is powerful and saves 00:04:24.343 --> 00:04:31.912 lives. As the risk evolves, so must our ability to prepare for such a risk. 00:04:31.965 --> 00:04:37.044 And this is why President von der Leyen announced in her State of the Union speech 00:04:37.121 --> 00:04:43.228 the creation of a new advisory group on European disaster preparedness. 00:04:43.305 --> 00:04:48.420 And today, the Commission is establishing that group, prepare EU. 00:04:48.705 --> 00:04:54.379 It brings together 11 senior civil protection and crisis management experts and six 00:04:54.478 --> 00:05:00.358 scientists and academics to examine the threats Europe faces. 00:05:00.465 --> 00:05:06.328 They will assess our existing capabilities and recommend how to strengthen them. 00:05:06.405 --> 00:05:11.022 The demand for stronger European cooperation from citizens is there. 00:05:11.085 --> 00:05:17.731 Today, we also publish new Eurobarometer, 94 of Europeans believe countries should 00:05:17.787 --> 00:05:22.768 help one another when disaster overwhelm national capacities. 00:05:22.845 --> 00:05:30.653 And 91% of people won't even stronger European coordination to face the future 00:05:30.745 --> 00:05:37.572 crisis. Prepare EU will put forward concrete recommendations by spring of the next 00:05:37.650 --> 00:05:41.625 year, to help turning this ambition into action. 00:05:41.745 --> 00:05:48.548 And both on Prepare EU and on Eurobarometer, we have prepared press release for you, 00:05:48.587 --> 00:05:49.787 which you can check. 00:05:50.745 --> 00:05:59.252 Thank you very much, Eva. And before closing our announcements, just a kind reminder 00:05:59.316 --> 00:06:05.614 that there will be no midday briefing next Monday, as the Commission will be closed 00:06:05.685 --> 00:06:13.603 for all souls' day. So we will see you back here in the press room on Tuesday. 00:06:13.725 --> 00:06:16.890 And now, who would like to take the first question? 00:06:16.965 --> 00:06:18.345 Yes, Christian. 00:06:21.645 --> 00:06:23.528 Thanks, Paola. Christian, I would answer Europe. 00:06:23.565 --> 00:06:25.684 A question for Anna-Kaisa on the methane regulation. 00:06:25.725 --> 00:06:30.508 The Council has postponed the discussion on the proposal until next Friday. 00:06:30.585 --> 00:06:33.066 So I was wondering, would this leave little time for trialogues? 00:06:33.105 --> 00:06:37.006 Obviously. So I was wondering, is there any strict timeline or deadline from the 00:06:37.045 --> 00:06:41.647 Commission's side for reaching agreement, or are you fine with the adoption being 00:06:41.709 --> 00:06:47.175 pushed back until next year? And then a second question on the substance, if I may. 00:06:47.325 --> 00:06:50.136 The Parliament adopted a position for a three-year delay. 00:06:50.265 --> 00:06:55.037 You proposed a limited one-year delay. So I was wondering, have you assessed the 00:06:55.083 --> 00:06:59.534 impact of different lengths of postponement, including potentially a three-year 00:06:59.575 --> 00:07:00.775 delay? Thank you. 00:07:02.925 --> 00:07:07.856 When we made the proposal a few weeks ago, it is now with the call it is later, and 00:07:07.905 --> 00:07:14.863 it is obviously their prerogative to now set the speed at which they will take this 00:07:14.925 --> 00:07:19.617 forward. We obviously made very clear that we had good reasons to make a proposal 00:07:19.665 --> 00:07:24.322 for to delay by one year. We stand by that. 00:07:24.405 --> 00:07:28.065 We consider this to be the appropriate measure to take at this point in time. 00:07:28.125 --> 00:07:31.082 But it is the prerogative, obviously, of the call it is later. 00:07:31.125 --> 00:07:37.491 Now, to decide on the speed, and we stand ready to support and be part of this 00:07:37.593 --> 00:07:43.242 exercise as we proceed. And I think that answers your question. 00:07:43.305 --> 00:07:49.465 It answers the question on the Parliament's three-year as well. 00:07:49.845 --> 00:07:53.018 We respect the right of the call it is later. 00:07:53.085 --> 00:07:56.439 To make up their own opinion and position on what we propose. 00:07:56.505 --> 00:08:02.823 But we put on the table a proposal to postpone by one year. 00:08:02.925 --> 00:08:06.961 We consider this to be sufficient. To allow the necessary flexibility that we want 00:08:07.005 --> 00:08:12.615 to achieve. And then what is needed in the current period. 00:08:12.765 --> 00:08:22.292 And therefore, we will engage now with the Parliament and the Council to ensure that 00:08:22.403 --> 00:08:30.052 the process. For the proposal that we made, it fully preserved in its essential 00:08:30.126 --> 00:08:33.364 scope. And it would not distort it. This is where we are. 00:08:33.405 --> 00:08:38.925 But as to the timetable, as to the comments made by the call it is later, as by the 00:08:38.985 --> 00:08:43.595 suggestions for the timeline, this is the prerogative of the call it is later. 00:08:43.665 --> 00:08:47.369 This is not for us to comment here. These are questions that should be asked to the 00:08:47.411 --> 00:08:48.825 Council or to the European Parliament. 00:08:50.805 --> 00:08:52.065 Christian, you have a follow-up. 00:08:54.405 --> 00:08:57.465 Thanks. Just on the impact of this, because you didn't really answer that question, 00:08:57.495 --> 00:08:59.342 I think. So wondering if you've assessed that. 00:08:59.385 --> 00:09:01.331 I mean, you said it's sufficient, one year is sufficient. 00:09:01.365 --> 00:09:05.519 But did you assess the impact of a longer delay, one year delay, or did you just 00:09:05.566 --> 00:09:10.058 take one year on the basis that it can't do too much damage? 00:09:10.125 --> 00:09:11.325 Thank you. 00:09:11.805 --> 00:09:16.476 You will see when you look at the proposal that we made, there is this kind of 00:09:16.622 --> 00:09:25.981 prelude to before the legal. Text. And there is a mention on impact. 00:09:26.205 --> 00:09:32.432 Impacts as well. And given that we are not touching the substance or the ambition of 00:09:32.486 --> 00:09:39.361 the methane regulation at all with this very, very targeted amendment, this so we're 00:09:39.427 --> 00:09:43.857 not changing the substance or the spirit or the objective, at all. 00:09:43.965 --> 00:09:50.880 So therefore, there is no further impact assessment now being carried out while the 00:09:50.965 --> 00:09:56.455 proposal is with the call it is later. We are not introducing any new requirements 00:09:56.505 --> 00:10:00.822 to the member states or the operators with this very, very targeted amendment. 00:10:00.885 --> 00:10:04.731 So you will see this language. It is all in the proposal that we made. 00:10:04.785 --> 00:10:09.123 So now it's a normal co-decision process. It is now with the call it is later. 00:10:09.165 --> 00:10:16.208 And we do not, from the Commission, have any comments to run on the record 00:10:16.305 --> 00:10:19.679 commenting the process that is ongoing in the Parliament and in the European 00:10:19.717 --> 00:10:20.917 Council. 00:10:21.885 --> 00:10:28.245 Okay. And I have one more question. Yes. Nicholas for Anna-Kaisa. 00:10:29.025 --> 00:10:32.993 Thank you so much. It's Nicholas for Rapporteur. 00:10:33.105 --> 00:10:35.708 You said prerogative of the call it is later to make up their own mind. 00:10:35.745 --> 00:10:40.474 It's also the prerogative of the Commission to withdraw the legislation should the 00:10:40.561 --> 00:10:45.592 call it is later in. Pose too much bureaucracy, significantly, as you said, distort 00:10:45.655 --> 00:10:50.993 the nature of the proposal. Is the Commission recognizing its ability to withdraw 00:10:51.045 --> 00:10:52.245 the law? 00:10:52.725 --> 00:10:57.911 We don't propose exactly. We don't want to now go to the speculation but I do 00:10:57.966 --> 00:11:01.340 appreciate that you consistently ask this question. 00:11:01.425 --> 00:11:07.014 Repeatedly, it's good. And our response remains the same, that we have now made the 00:11:07.056 --> 00:11:08.769 proposal. It is now with the call it is later. 00:11:08.805 --> 00:11:14.607 We work with everybody. And we hope that we will have a solution soon enough to 00:11:14.718 --> 00:11:23.264 preserve because ultimately, our main goal and objective is to preserve the 00:11:23.333 --> 00:11:27.844 regulation. And that should be also the ultimate goal for the Parliament and the 00:11:27.902 --> 00:11:32.500 Council. And we made in this current situation, in this current context, we made a 00:11:32.554 --> 00:11:38.859 proposal delay its entry into force by one year, or the certain obligations to enter 00:11:38.915 --> 00:11:44.185 into force by one year. So ultimately, this should kind of be the framework now for 00:11:44.242 --> 00:11:50.085 everybody. And we work in this context. But we do not make any kind of speculative 00:11:50.145 --> 00:11:54.885 football commentary now from the podium what might or might not happen. 00:11:56.925 --> 00:12:00.117 We. Absolutely stick to our proposal. Nicholas. 00:12:00.165 --> 00:12:01.365 Philip. 00:12:01.365 --> 00:12:02.565 Can I just quickly follow up? 00:12:04.305 --> 00:12:05.505 Go ahead. 00:12:07.905 --> 00:12:11.275 It was previously on this podium that the Commission announced the withdrawal of the 00:12:11.312 --> 00:12:15.431 Green Claims Directive when the call it is later exceeded too much, which means that 00:12:15.486 --> 00:12:18.126 there is precedent that this can be announced at the podium. 00:12:18.165 --> 00:12:24.285 Just wondering whether this would be the place where you could okay, this is 00:12:24.333 --> 00:12:27.465 actually extremely speculative, but just like. 00:12:27.645 --> 00:12:29.205 Thank you. You answered your own question. 00:12:29.565 --> 00:12:33.765 Next. Philip. 00:12:36.525 --> 00:12:41.827 Thank you. Philip Bello-Servin with the Norwegian Media Energy Org Klima. 00:12:41.985 --> 00:12:46.581 Today, Commissioner Jørgensen presented his implementation report. 00:12:46.665 --> 00:12:54.433 And it's not looking very implemented. So to say, because for many files, like the 00:12:54.488 --> 00:13:01.393 energy efficiency directive, there are 52 infringement cases for the buildings' 00:13:01.464 --> 00:13:04.303 energy performance directive or regulation. 00:13:04.365 --> 00:13:14.190 There's only Czechia has satisfactorily implemented the regulation. 00:13:14.385 --> 00:13:21.175 And in total, there are 239 infringement cases what. 00:13:21.225 --> 00:13:28.731 Is the point of making regulations and directives if they're not implemented? 00:13:28.785 --> 00:13:37.918 And will the Commission. Do come up with the change of pace in some sort to tackle 00:13:38.025 --> 00:13:47.901 the lack of implementation when everything every major EUCO meeting here seems to 00:13:47.985 --> 00:13:51.919 touch on the topic of energy? And at the same time, all these very important energy 00:13:51.974 --> 00:13:54.825 files are just not being followed up. 00:13:56.085 --> 00:14:03.502 That is a very, very good question that probably would merit an entire seminar to 00:14:03.571 --> 00:14:07.087 kind of tackle from a more philosophical point of view, what is the point of 00:14:07.125 --> 00:14:09.242 legislation indeed if it's not being implemented? 00:14:09.285 --> 00:14:16.274 And this is a question that should go not just to us in the Commission, but also 00:14:16.365 --> 00:14:23.865 many, many others. What is the purpose of sort of our goal is not to infringe, not 00:14:23.925 --> 00:14:26.909 to pinpoint shortcomings in the member states. 00:14:26.985 --> 00:14:34.703 Our approach is always to help and assist member states to be able to implement what 00:14:34.818 --> 00:14:40.728 has been agreed. Because what we present from here, what the legislation that we 00:14:40.782 --> 00:14:44.518 present, it is adopted jointly with the Parliament and the European Council. 00:14:44.565 --> 00:14:51.343 Meaning with the member states. So now, you refer to implementing report with 00:14:51.424 --> 00:14:55.083 certain with some energy pieces of energy legislation. 00:14:55.125 --> 00:14:59.190 And then obviously, you managed to paint a fairly bleak picture of nothing being 00:14:59.242 --> 00:15:03.756 implemented and nobody being on track, which is obviously not the case. 00:15:03.825 --> 00:15:12.863 But it is one important tool for us to track progress and to have an understanding 00:15:12.928 --> 00:15:20.985 of how our member states are able to keep up and where they see where they clearly 00:15:21.090 --> 00:15:26.798 experience challenges is that we have this very regular, very comprehensive 00:15:26.865 --> 00:15:33.936 tracking. And reporting. Annually, and sometimes even more often, of their progress. 00:15:34.005 --> 00:15:38.219 So even though, yes, you said that what is the purpose of anything? 00:15:38.265 --> 00:15:42.733 Because no one's doing nothing. It's not as grim as that. 00:15:42.825 --> 00:15:51.105 But it shows that there is also merit to our approach of having regular reporting, 00:15:51.155 --> 00:15:55.701 being in contact with member states on a regular basis, having an understanding 00:15:55.752 --> 00:15:59.371 where they are meeting challenges, how we can help them. 00:15:59.445 --> 00:16:04.028 But I will absolutely not subscribe to kind of what is the purpose of legislating on 00:16:04.080 --> 00:16:13.442 anything. Absolutely not. We have been able to reach significant Changes and 00:16:13.531 --> 00:16:18.995 improvements as regards energy climate transport, environment, et cetera, by our 00:16:19.065 --> 00:16:24.453 legislation. But it is true, yes, given that we have this very comprehensive 00:16:24.525 --> 00:16:29.553 tracking and monitoring with our member states, obviously, we are also very 00:16:29.610 --> 00:16:32.145 transparent with the shortcomings and challenges. 00:16:33.045 --> 00:16:42.037 So if I can just resume and for your question, I would say, first of all, EU 00:16:42.119 --> 00:16:47.619 legislation, be it on energy or on any other field, is the result of an agreement 00:16:47.685 --> 00:16:52.659 between the Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council with all its member 00:16:52.702 --> 00:16:54.725 states represented there. That's the first thing. 00:16:54.765 --> 00:17:00.517 And the second, as Anneke has also said, legislation has been a key driver. 00:17:00.585 --> 00:17:06.230 And certainly, in the field of energy, in the field of climate, it has been a clear 00:17:06.325 --> 00:17:12.045 decisive driver of good, positive change. Philip. 00:17:15.525 --> 00:17:21.536 The reason for my question is that some of these files are very central to the Green 00:17:21.698 --> 00:17:26.454 Deal, some of these files really legislative. 00:17:26.505 --> 00:17:30.552 On areas that are topics of discussion right now. 00:17:30.705 --> 00:17:38.838 And seem to be very, very central parts of the EU's politics these past few years. 00:17:38.925 --> 00:17:46.412 And the fact that for some of them, no member state has implemented the files seems 00:17:46.481 --> 00:17:53.919 to be like an acute issue that would warrant perhaps stronger or more proactive 00:17:54.006 --> 00:17:59.735 response. So I'm wondering, are you worried at all about these implementation 00:17:59.790 --> 00:18:03.825 figures? And will there be a change of pace in any way? 00:18:06.705 --> 00:18:14.206 It really depends a bit what like we have to take a step back and see the bigger 00:18:14.260 --> 00:18:18.276 picture and the kind of the longer-term trend. 00:18:18.585 --> 00:18:23.515 Of what is it that we are here to do? And what are the objectives that we want to 00:18:23.565 --> 00:18:28.917 reach? And where do we where do we clearly have shortcomings? 00:18:28.965 --> 00:18:34.234 We have to take into account the context in which member states are implementing and 00:18:34.291 --> 00:18:36.829 putting in practice some of this legislation. 00:18:36.885 --> 00:18:41.694 And as I said, I mean, the projections that we make for example, to reach the 00:18:41.777 --> 00:18:46.967 climate neutrality by 2050 or cutting emissions by 90%, et cetera, et cetera, these 00:18:47.052 --> 00:18:52.385 are all based on our calculation that there will be a full implementation of our 00:18:52.439 --> 00:18:58.351 legislation. So of course, we the starting point is that when we legislate, and when 00:18:58.432 --> 00:19:03.831 we jointly agree on something with our member states and the Parliament, it will be 00:19:03.901 --> 00:19:09.262 then done. But then at the same time, we are especially in the field of energy, and 00:19:09.314 --> 00:19:13.386 especially as regards energy legislation, it is at the same time a very, very 00:19:13.440 --> 00:19:17.841 challenging context in which our member states are putting in place and implementing 00:19:17.914 --> 00:19:22.900 some of these laws. The past five years, I mean, this is the second massive energy 00:19:22.998 --> 00:19:26.550 crisis which is putting a huge strain on member states. 00:19:26.625 --> 00:19:34.390 So therefore, it is still it has merit that we have a very, very transparent 00:19:34.605 --> 00:19:39.124 granular. System of having this exchange with our member states. 00:19:39.165 --> 00:19:43.536 Because that help us helps us understand that where are the shortcomings? 00:19:43.605 --> 00:19:49.591 Is there something can we give some flexibility within the legislation? 00:19:49.725 --> 00:19:55.015 Is there something that has to be done? Or is this a systemic thing? 00:19:55.125 --> 00:20:00.693 And this is some of the examples. The methane, one year, is one example. 00:20:00.765 --> 00:20:03.879 Our member states, the majority of our member states, got in touch with us and said 00:20:03.912 --> 00:20:06.029 that is there something you can do about this? 00:20:06.105 --> 00:20:14.997 And we did. So while we don't operate in a vacuum either, but I would not draw too 00:20:15.081 --> 00:20:20.981 dramatic conclusions based on an implementing report that focuses on certain type of 00:20:21.045 --> 00:20:25.885 legislation. It is just a snapshot of a specific area. 00:20:26.025 --> 00:20:30.705 But it shows that we take implementation very seriously. 00:20:30.885 --> 00:20:35.415 This is why we do these reports. And this is why we make these reports public as 00:20:35.465 --> 00:20:37.065 well, for everybody else to see. 00:20:37.965 --> 00:20:42.473 And in the meantime, we're not just acknowledging the results of this reports. 00:20:42.525 --> 00:20:48.586 We have a number of groups with the member states dedicated to accompany the 00:20:48.653 --> 00:20:53.991 implementation, the transposition in each member state on a number of pieces of 00:20:54.105 --> 00:20:59.334 legislation. On energy efficiency, on renewables, where we sit and discuss in detail 00:20:59.385 --> 00:21:03.722 how to go about this. And this report helps us precisely see as Anneke has said, 00:21:03.774 --> 00:21:11.681 where are the biggest challenges. Any other questions for Anneke as of today? 00:21:11.805 --> 00:21:18.775 I see Hank Jakob. Is it for Anneke? No, but I gave you the floor. 00:21:18.825 --> 00:21:20.025 Go ahead. 00:21:24.885 --> 00:21:30.405 Hi. Thank you. It's a question about the car deal negotiated by Volkswagen with the 00:21:30.465 --> 00:21:35.971 US government and that apparently will also apply to all other German car makers. 00:21:36.045 --> 00:21:41.003 My question is, is the Commission informed about these negotiations that were done 00:21:41.057 --> 00:21:46.169 by the CEOs of German car companies with the US government to lower the effective 00:21:46.254 --> 00:21:51.909 tariff rate of the US on German cars? And do you have any comments on that, on those 00:21:51.980 --> 00:21:56.854 deals that will basically mean that they get lower tariffs if they produce more in 00:21:56.929 --> 00:22:00.285 the US, leading to jobs moving from Europe to the US? 00:22:02.985 --> 00:22:07.796 Thank you, Jakob. I think I saw some reporting in that sense. 00:22:07.845 --> 00:22:11.503 Indeed, we do not have comments to offer at this stage. 00:22:11.565 --> 00:22:19.510 But we'll get back to you on this. Other questions? 00:22:19.725 --> 00:22:20.925 Yes, please. 00:22:22.245 --> 00:22:26.798 Um. One question regarding the social media guidelines. 00:22:26.865 --> 00:22:33.266 As the EU Kids Act in Austria, there's quite an uproar since yesterday about the 00:22:33.323 --> 00:22:41.394 decision of the Commission. So yesterday, I thought Vice Chancellor Babler and State 00:22:41.469 --> 00:22:49.794 Secretary Pröll called the Commission for taking action and for making a solution 00:22:49.903 --> 00:22:53.387 until March 27. Do you think that's realistic? 00:22:53.445 --> 00:23:00.801 And could you give us maybe kind of like a roadmap for the following months for EU 00:23:00.885 --> 00:23:02.085 Kids Act? 00:23:04.425 --> 00:23:05.865 Thank you. Good afternoon. 00:23:06.225 --> 00:23:10.339 So first, one point to be extremely clear. 00:23:10.425 --> 00:23:15.477 The message goes to all member states. We now need to focus on the negotiations of 00:23:15.525 --> 00:23:20.277 the Kids Act. This is the top priority not to fragment the market and to protect all 00:23:20.335 --> 00:23:23.575 kids. I think the Commission was extremely clear on this. 00:23:23.685 --> 00:23:27.363 And this is where we're accounting definitely on member states who already advanced 00:23:27.417 --> 00:23:32.145 the work at national level. And who have come up with potential solutions like 00:23:32.205 --> 00:23:35.925 Austria to lead this process, to help us to advance this work. 00:23:35.985 --> 00:23:40.715 I mean, it's a very ambitious timeline. I can agree that we have indeed received a 00:23:40.780 --> 00:23:46.108 letter from the Austrian side, you're right, where this tentative agenda of March 00:23:46.271 --> 00:23:52.212 2027 has been raised with us. We are all in favor of an ambitious agenda for our 00:23:52.264 --> 00:23:56.781 Kids Act. So let's work hand in hand with all our member states to get this over the 00:23:56.835 --> 00:23:58.035 line as quickly as possible. 00:23:59.205 --> 00:24:04.965 Thank you. You have a follow-up? Yeah. Go ahead. 00:24:05.445 --> 00:24:13.237 Yeah, also in this letter, it's written that if otherwise the negotiations come not 00:24:13.334 --> 00:24:24.358 to a solution until March 27, Austria will taking take action again for. 00:24:24.585 --> 00:24:28.725 Proposing national solutions. So what's your position on that? 00:24:31.725 --> 00:24:38.293 I'm an optimist. I mean, we have clear evidence at our disposal that shows how much 00:24:38.352 --> 00:24:42.635 damage is being done by online social media platforms, our kids on a daily basis. 00:24:42.705 --> 00:24:48.236 We have seen indeed several member states, including Austria, who have come out with 00:24:48.301 --> 00:24:53.952 potential national measures. We have come up with a harmonized EU-wide proposal. 00:24:54.045 --> 00:25:00.510 So I do believe that we have a lot of and a strong push from everywhere across 00:25:00.585 --> 00:25:04.728 Europe to get a deal over the line as quickly as possible. 00:25:04.785 --> 00:25:08.778 So I will not prejudge what may happen or not after March. 00:25:08.865 --> 00:25:13.293 We have now come forward with a postponement for 12 months. 00:25:13.425 --> 00:25:17.209 Let us use these 12 months to preserve the work of our co-legislators. 00:25:17.265 --> 00:25:22.136 Let's work hand in hand with Austria. So this is absolutely nothing against Austria. 00:25:22.185 --> 00:25:26.462 This is work together with Austria and all member states to advance the work on the 00:25:26.505 --> 00:25:27.705 Kids Act. 00:25:28.305 --> 00:25:33.838 Thank you, Thomas. Other questions for Thomas? 00:25:34.005 --> 00:25:39.562 Does not seem to be the case. Other topics today here in the room? 00:25:39.645 --> 00:25:40.845 Jorge? 00:25:42.885 --> 00:25:50.352 Hello, Paula. Sorry. Hello, Paula. There are currently seven ships going from Russia 00:25:50.435 --> 00:25:54.465 to the US, carrying diesel under the Trump-Putin deal. 00:25:54.585 --> 00:25:58.638 It appears that several of these ships are actually of European origin. 00:25:58.725 --> 00:26:03.991 We have seen that US senators are warning these ships to go back because they say 00:26:04.043 --> 00:26:08.349 the sanctions waiver does not overrule US Congress. 00:26:08.445 --> 00:26:12.710 Do you have any position on this matter? What's your advice to these vessels? 00:26:12.765 --> 00:26:15.173 Should they go back or should they keep going? 00:26:15.225 --> 00:26:16.425 Thank you. 00:26:17.685 --> 00:26:23.433 I. My advice in this case does not really matter. 00:26:23.565 --> 00:26:25.968 What matters is the position that we have. 00:26:26.025 --> 00:26:31.001 On this topic and which we set out very clearly from the beginning. 00:26:31.065 --> 00:26:37.261 You know what the position is. There are sanctions in place. 00:26:37.365 --> 00:26:45.061 Supported by the EU when it comes to the exports of oil and oil products from 00:26:45.160 --> 00:26:50.892 Russia. They're subject to sanctions. They're subject to an oil price cap. 00:26:51.045 --> 00:27:03.338 And we stick to those sanctions. And the less that can be promoted in terms of those 00:27:03.445 --> 00:27:10.185 exports, the better. Other questions? David? 00:27:15.765 --> 00:27:21.060 Thank you, Paula. David Price, your democracy and human info. 00:27:21.225 --> 00:27:29.731 I want to come back to the question of the Canada and the associate membership or 00:27:29.841 --> 00:27:36.114 associate agreement. The Commission is the guardian of the treaties. 00:27:36.165 --> 00:27:43.291 And there was a very elegant solution which was for association which was made in 00:27:43.365 --> 00:27:48.186 1950s with the European Community. And United Kingdom. 00:27:48.285 --> 00:27:56.181 And it lasted for a couple of decades. Before European Community European Kingdom 00:27:56.265 --> 00:28:03.705 became a member. So I'm wondering whether this solution which was to create a 00:28:04.725 --> 00:28:14.107 association. Council which was tied to the European Commission or high community 00:28:14.183 --> 00:28:18.133 high authorities was then has been considered. 00:28:18.225 --> 00:28:23.442 Because it's a very short treaty of 15 articles. 00:28:23.565 --> 00:28:28.455 It created a standing committee with four members from each side. 00:28:28.545 --> 00:28:36.562 And discussed and exchanged information on a number of topics of great importance to 00:28:36.623 --> 00:28:46.676 all of them. And included for example consumer Consumer issues. 00:28:46.965 --> 00:28:53.662 What discussion has taken place inside the Commission relative to this precedent for 00:28:53.754 --> 00:29:02.251 creating associations with external Bodies and countries? 00:29:02.325 --> 00:29:05.781 And has anything been taken forward on it? 00:29:05.865 --> 00:29:10.240 The Commission, as I say, is the guardian of the of the treaties. 00:29:10.305 --> 00:29:15.225 And this was probably one of the first that was ever made. 00:29:15.945 --> 00:29:23.145 David, if my memory serves me correctly, that agreement that you're referring to in 00:29:23.245 --> 00:29:28.277 the 50s with UK was with the Coal and Steel Community. 00:29:28.365 --> 00:29:40.080 So based on a different treaty. And we do not really have the same type of of. 00:29:40.185 --> 00:29:46.137 Mechanism that is foreseen in the current treaty for the European Union. 00:29:46.245 --> 00:29:51.756 So I cannot say that this has been the basis or inspiration for what is being 00:29:51.834 --> 00:29:57.928 discussed and flagged today. And today indeed when we speak of Canada, when we speak 00:29:57.995 --> 00:30:05.254 of never closer relation with Canada, which stops short of full membership because 00:30:05.325 --> 00:30:11.480 also based on the treaty Canada cannot become an EU member state, we are looking 00:30:11.579 --> 00:30:16.027 into really bringing Canada closer to the EU. 00:30:16.125 --> 00:30:24.019 Closer than any other non-EU country. Closer than anything we have done before. 00:30:24.105 --> 00:30:28.937 In terms of closer alignment and cooperation on policies, on programs, on 00:30:29.013 --> 00:30:39.545 governance. And I invite you to also read the speech from the President yesterday in 00:30:39.645 --> 00:30:48.228 Canada, where she also elaborates on what this closer ever closer relation with 00:30:48.325 --> 00:30:52.911 Canada entails. And gives concrete examples. 00:30:53.025 --> 00:31:05.582 And Reminds that it is time to work on new frontiers together which. 00:31:05.625 --> 00:31:14.125 Is very much inspired on what Germany wrote when he came back from Canada himself. 00:31:14.265 --> 00:31:22.485 At the beginning of the 20th century. Yes, David? 00:31:26.565 --> 00:31:35.685 Yeah. The idea of geography is a bit of a red herring because part of Canada is also 00:31:36.105 --> 00:31:40.298 part of the illegal sovereignty of the European Union, which is 00:31:40.365 --> 00:31:47.877 Saint-Pierre-Miquelon so the geography was not considered as part of the way to 00:31:47.979 --> 00:31:55.132 discuss this problem. And it was discussed on the basis of European human rights 00:31:55.201 --> 00:31:58.470 law. And specifically the Council of Europe Human Rights Law. 00:31:58.545 --> 00:32:05.292 So I wonder whether those principles can be have been discussed because it's 00:32:05.343 --> 00:32:09.174 extraordinary that you people talking about geography and geography has got nothing 00:32:09.216 --> 00:32:14.870 to do with it. Cyprus was considered to be part of Asia before it joined. 00:32:14.985 --> 00:32:22.220 And part of the sovereignty of the European Union is worldwide basically. 00:32:22.305 --> 00:32:25.305 Including South America Canada. 00:32:26.085 --> 00:32:33.056 And North America and Asia and so on. So I wonder whether the basic principles of 00:32:33.150 --> 00:32:36.225 that first association agreement. 00:32:40.883 --> 00:32:44.976 Should be looked at more carefully. It sounds like you haven't actually considered 00:32:45.023 --> 00:32:46.223 it. 00:32:47.063 --> 00:32:53.640 Um, David, thank you. And without entering into discussions on geography, I can 00:32:53.712 --> 00:32:59.243 assure you, and confirm, that it's really precisely based on principles and very 00:32:59.303 --> 00:33:04.047 solid principles and values that we share with Canada, that we are having this 00:33:04.130 --> 00:33:09.732 discussion for an ever closer relation. And those principles are also being 00:33:09.788 --> 00:33:17.198 reiterated, recalled, by the leaders the three leaders present in Montréal today, 00:33:17.251 --> 00:33:22.684 and we will have the occasion to hear more from President von der Leyen on this at 00:33:22.746 --> 00:33:27.203 the joint press conference this afternoon. 00:33:27.323 --> 00:33:32.903 I have Pierre Benazir online. 00:33:37.523 --> 00:33:38.363 Yes, I have a question. 00:33:38.363 --> 00:33:39.563 for Anouar. 00:33:40.283 --> 00:33:41.483 Yes, go ahead. 00:33:43.043 --> 00:33:49.198 Er, the Algerian Parliament has announced the deployment of troops and military 00:33:49.292 --> 00:33:54.622 resources to Niger. Just as the recommendations of the European Union's 00:33:54.667 --> 00:34:00.633 Representative for the Sahel, Mr Cravigny, seem have been heeded, since the Nigerien 00:34:00.696 --> 00:34:04.497 diplomat presented his letters of credence this month. 00:34:04.577 --> 00:34:09.460 I would like to know where relations between the European Union and Niger stand, and 00:34:09.524 --> 00:34:13.583 whether there is any comment on this Algerian military deployment in the Sahel. 00:34:16.883 --> 00:34:18.083 Wait, Anouar. 00:34:18.323 --> 00:34:21.442 Thank you, thank you Pierre for your question. 00:34:21.501 --> 00:34:25.549 We have indeed taken note, and acknowledged the information according to which, at 00:34:25.600 --> 00:34:30.618 the initiative of President Tebboune, the Algerian Parliament has approved the 00:34:30.713 --> 00:34:33.419 deployment of Algerian army units in Niger. 00:34:33.473 --> 00:34:37.660 We are closely monitoring the situation and seeking further clarification on its 00:34:37.717 --> 00:34:42.839 scope and objective, as well as basis of this reported deployment. 00:34:42.890 --> 00:34:47.382 As the European Union, we reaffirm our support for efforts that contribute to peace, 00:34:47.447 --> 00:34:52.337 stability and security in the Sahel, and this in full respect of international law, 00:34:52.384 --> 00:34:56.103 the sovereignty of States and the protection of civilians. 00:34:56.146 --> 00:35:00.673 I will also recall that any security measure should be transparent, proportionate 00:35:00.762 --> 00:35:06.257 and conducive to regional de-escalation as well as to long-term stability. 00:35:06.317 --> 00:35:10.450 We, for our part, remain in contact with the relevant partners and continue to 00:35:10.507 --> 00:35:14.766 support peaceful, effective and sustainable solutions to the region's security 00:35:14.852 --> 00:35:16.052 problems. 00:35:17.963 --> 00:35:27.338 Thank you. Anouar. Any other questions for Anouar? 00:35:27.444 --> 00:35:29.903 That is not the case. Any other questions? 00:35:32.243 --> 00:35:33.443 Yes, please. 00:35:34.583 --> 00:35:38.329 So, Niklas Pichler, Austrian press agency again. 00:35:38.543 --> 00:35:42.860 A question regarding the special taxes in Hungary. 00:35:42.983 --> 00:35:52.178 Yesterday we heard about a letter concerning the special taxes from Spa CEO Hans K. 00:35:52.283 --> 00:35:58.661 Reich to the Commission. Could you confirm already receiving this letter, and what's 00:35:58.718 --> 00:36:00.503 your position to this letter? 00:36:01.643 --> 00:36:06.729 Thank you. Indeed, we looked into it following your question yesterday. 00:36:06.803 --> 00:36:08.543 And Louise. 00:36:08.843 --> 00:36:09.143 Yes? 00:36:09.143 --> 00:36:10.343 What can we say today? 00:36:10.943 --> 00:36:15.033 Hi, yes, thank you for your question. So indeed we can now confirm that we have 00:36:15.083 --> 00:36:20.337 received the letter from the CEO of the Spa-Austria group. 00:36:20.483 --> 00:36:26.465 We're assessing its content for now, and just to specify as well, and give a bit of 00:36:26.527 --> 00:36:32.873 context, on this retail tax regime in Hungary, there's an ongoing infringement 00:36:32.961 --> 00:36:38.080 procedure. So the European Commission decided to refer Hungary to the Court of 00:36:38.145 --> 00:36:44.881 Justice in April 2026. In the meantime, Hungary adopted legislation in summer 2026 00:36:44.963 --> 00:36:49.368 to abolish the discriminatory aspects of the retail tax regime. 00:36:49.463 --> 00:36:54.813 We are still assessing this legislation, and its effect for foreign retail companies 00:36:54.863 --> 00:37:00.310 in Hungary. So for now, we're in contact with the Hungarian authorities and we will 00:37:00.378 --> 00:37:01.943 consider possible next steps. 00:37:03.563 --> 00:37:13.313 Okay. Good. Other questions to Louise who is also stepping in for Maciej today? 00:37:13.523 --> 00:37:18.623 No? Then we go again online. Momchil. 00:37:24.803 --> 00:37:31.484 Good afternoon. There is very a very sad news from Russia just came. 00:37:31.583 --> 00:37:39.019 One the newspaper Novaya Gazeta which was directed by the famous journalist Dmitry 00:37:39.128 --> 00:37:44.693 Muratov who was also Nobel laureate announced that it's closing. 00:37:44.783 --> 00:37:48.863 Is the Commission aware of this and what it's what is its command? 00:37:50.363 --> 00:37:54.717 Thank you, Momchil. I was personally not aware. 00:37:54.803 --> 00:38:00.513 I'm looking at the team we do not have a reaction at this stage on that. 00:38:00.563 --> 00:38:02.183 We'll look into it and get back to you. 00:38:03.443 --> 00:38:04.283 Thank you. 00:38:04.283 --> 00:38:12.263 Thank you. Other questions for us today? It's yes, there you go. 00:38:15.143 --> 00:38:17.953 Thank you, Viber Vlainić, Croatian Radio Television. 00:38:18.023 --> 00:38:22.679 I want to ask something about planned negotiations between Russia, Ukraine, and the 00:38:22.742 --> 00:38:29.386 United States. So the Kremlin spokesperson just said that at some stage the 00:38:29.460 --> 00:38:37.691 participation of European representatives will be necessary, will be will be needed. 00:38:37.763 --> 00:38:43.333 So is the Commission preparing for that stage of the negotiations? 00:38:43.403 --> 00:38:46.463 Is it prepared to send someone to negotiate? 00:38:48.263 --> 00:38:53.293 Of course we are prepared, and we have been preparing for a long time. 00:38:53.423 --> 00:38:57.420 And we just are looking forward to the moment. 00:38:57.503 --> 00:39:04.720 Where indeed Russia will be ready to engage in real discussions and in real terms to 00:39:04.823 --> 00:39:11.932 put an end to this war. Any other questions? 00:39:12.083 --> 00:39:18.035 Not today, so we wish you a good hopefully also long weekend. 00:39:18.124 --> 00:39:20.783 And wish you a good afternoon.