1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,000 Brussels Live Transcribed and translated by AI 2 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,917 Hello and a very warm welcome to our midday meeting. 3 00:00:03,969 --> 00:00:08,404 Before taking your questions, we have a few announcements for you. 4 00:00:08,487 --> 00:00:14,328 And let us start with President von der Leyen's agenda for next week. 5 00:00:14,451 --> 00:00:22,225 So, on Monday, the President will receive CEOs of European start-ups and sustainable 6 00:00:22,308 --> 00:00:27,044 development actors at a working dinner here in Parliament. 7 00:00:27,154 --> 00:00:35,145 On Tuesday, the President will deliver a speech on the occasion of the Win-Win 8 00:00:35,285 --> 00:00:41,902 summit. here in Brussels. And on Wednesday, the President will chair the meeting of 9 00:00:41,957 --> 00:00:46,254 the College of Commissioners, also in Brussels. 10 00:00:46,355 --> 00:00:50,510 So that is the President's agenda for now. 11 00:00:50,601 --> 00:00:57,635 as for next week. And I would also like to take this opportunity to remind you that 12 00:00:57,718 --> 00:01:04,701 a press conference will be held with President von der Leyen and the President of 13 00:01:04,778 --> 00:01:12,658 the European Council, Mr Coste, and the Prime Minister of Canada, Mr Carney, which 14 00:01:12,751 --> 00:01:20,173 will take place will be held in Montreal later in the day, as part of the European 15 00:01:20,252 --> 00:01:27,852 Union-Canada summit. The press conference is scheduled for around 5.15 p.m. 16 00:01:27,929 --> 00:01:37,797 Brussels time this afternoon. And you will be able to follow it live on EBS. 17 00:01:37,910 --> 00:01:45,502 And now, I would like to call on Anouar to join me. 18 00:01:45,582 --> 00:01:51,932 Sad news concerning Eaufore, Altea, and Anouar will explain what Eaufore and Altea 19 00:01:52,009 --> 00:01:54,225 are and why they are indeed sad news. 20 00:01:56,205 --> 00:01:57,405 Thank you, Paola. 21 00:02:00,465 --> 00:02:06,458 Indeed. Last evening, on the evening of the 29th of October, an Italian helicopter 22 00:02:06,525 --> 00:02:13,775 from our EU force in Bosnia and Herzegovina, EU4 Altea, which serves every day to 23 00:02:13,833 --> 00:02:19,861 support peace and stability in Bosnia and Herzegovina, crashed while conducting 24 00:02:19,940 --> 00:02:26,201 routine training. As a result of this accident, EU4 Altea suffered the loss of four 25 00:02:26,265 --> 00:02:30,978 persons on board, with another 11 injured, currently in a stable condition and 26 00:02:31,069 --> 00:02:37,425 receiving medical treatment. The European Union is deeply saddened by this tragic 27 00:02:37,545 --> 00:02:44,832 loss of life. We extend our deepest condolences to the families and friends of those 28 00:02:44,881 --> 00:02:48,814 who lost their lives in the service of peace. 29 00:02:48,945 --> 00:02:53,678 The high representative yesterday has conveyed her heartfelt condolences to the 30 00:02:53,745 --> 00:02:58,591 Italian ministers for foreign affairs and defense. 31 00:02:58,785 --> 00:03:04,185 Europe stands in full solidarity with Italy in this difficult time. 32 00:03:05,685 --> 00:03:12,465 Thank you, Anouar. And our thoughts and sentiments are with the family and the 33 00:03:12,525 --> 00:03:19,627 friends of all those who lost their lives in service in this tragic accident. 34 00:03:19,725 --> 00:03:28,365 Now, I would like to invite Eva to share some updates on our efforts to improve 35 00:03:28,467 --> 00:03:31,725 European disaster preparedness. Eva. 36 00:03:35,685 --> 00:03:40,799 Good afternoon, everybody. Let me change the topic and let's speak about wildfires, 37 00:03:40,898 --> 00:03:45,438 floods, extreme weather, health emergencies. 38 00:03:45,525 --> 00:03:49,390 All this is Europe facing more frequently. 39 00:03:49,485 --> 00:03:52,678 The crises are more destructive and more complex. 40 00:03:52,785 --> 00:03:56,103 Climate change is accelerating these risks. 41 00:03:56,205 --> 00:04:03,271 And these crises do not respect borders. And no country, however well-prepared, can 42 00:04:03,367 --> 00:04:07,901 face every threat alone. Europe makes a difference. 43 00:04:07,965 --> 00:04:12,022 With disaster strikes, countries can count on each other. 44 00:04:12,105 --> 00:04:16,730 We saw this again this summer when firefighters and aircraft crossed borders to 45 00:04:16,823 --> 00:04:24,231 battle devastating wildfires. In Europe, European solidarity is powerful and saves 46 00:04:24,343 --> 00:04:31,912 lives. As the risk evolves, so must our ability to prepare for such a risk. 47 00:04:31,965 --> 00:04:37,044 And this is why President von der Leyen announced in her State of the Union speech 48 00:04:37,121 --> 00:04:43,228 the creation of a new advisory group on European disaster preparedness. 49 00:04:43,305 --> 00:04:48,420 And today, the Commission is establishing that group, prepare EU. 50 00:04:48,705 --> 00:04:54,379 It brings together 11 senior civil protection and crisis management experts and six 51 00:04:54,478 --> 00:05:00,358 scientists and academics to examine the threats Europe faces. 52 00:05:00,465 --> 00:05:06,328 They will assess our existing capabilities and recommend how to strengthen them. 53 00:05:06,405 --> 00:05:11,022 The demand for stronger European cooperation from citizens is there. 54 00:05:11,085 --> 00:05:17,731 Today, we also publish new Eurobarometer, 94 of Europeans believe countries should 55 00:05:17,787 --> 00:05:22,768 help one another when disaster overwhelm national capacities. 56 00:05:22,845 --> 00:05:30,653 And 91% of people won't even stronger European coordination to face the future 57 00:05:30,745 --> 00:05:37,572 crisis. Prepare EU will put forward concrete recommendations by spring of the next 58 00:05:37,650 --> 00:05:41,625 year, to help turning this ambition into action. 59 00:05:41,745 --> 00:05:48,548 And both on Prepare EU and on Eurobarometer, we have prepared press release for you, 60 00:05:48,587 --> 00:05:49,787 which you can check. 61 00:05:50,745 --> 00:05:59,252 Thank you very much, Eva. And before closing our announcements, just a kind reminder 62 00:05:59,316 --> 00:06:05,614 that there will be no midday briefing next Monday, as the Commission will be closed 63 00:06:05,685 --> 00:06:13,603 for all souls' day. So we will see you back here in the press room on Tuesday. 64 00:06:13,725 --> 00:06:16,890 And now, who would like to take the first question? 65 00:06:16,965 --> 00:06:18,345 Yes, Christian. 66 00:06:21,645 --> 00:06:23,528 Thanks, Paola. Christian, I would answer Europe. 67 00:06:23,565 --> 00:06:25,684 A question for Anna-Kaisa on the methane regulation. 68 00:06:25,725 --> 00:06:30,508 The Council has postponed the discussion on the proposal until next Friday. 69 00:06:30,585 --> 00:06:33,066 So I was wondering, would this leave little time for trialogues? 70 00:06:33,105 --> 00:06:37,006 Obviously. So I was wondering, is there any strict timeline or deadline from the 71 00:06:37,045 --> 00:06:41,647 Commission's side for reaching agreement, or are you fine with the adoption being 72 00:06:41,709 --> 00:06:47,175 pushed back until next year? And then a second question on the substance, if I may. 73 00:06:47,325 --> 00:06:50,136 The Parliament adopted a position for a three-year delay. 74 00:06:50,265 --> 00:06:55,037 You proposed a limited one-year delay. So I was wondering, have you assessed the 75 00:06:55,083 --> 00:06:59,534 impact of different lengths of postponement, including potentially a three-year 76 00:06:59,575 --> 00:07:00,775 delay? Thank you. 77 00:07:02,925 --> 00:07:07,856 When we made the proposal a few weeks ago, it is now with the call it is later, and 78 00:07:07,905 --> 00:07:14,863 it is obviously their prerogative to now set the speed at which they will take this 79 00:07:14,925 --> 00:07:19,617 forward. We obviously made very clear that we had good reasons to make a proposal 80 00:07:19,665 --> 00:07:24,322 for to delay by one year. We stand by that. 81 00:07:24,405 --> 00:07:28,065 We consider this to be the appropriate measure to take at this point in time. 82 00:07:28,125 --> 00:07:31,082 But it is the prerogative, obviously, of the call it is later. 83 00:07:31,125 --> 00:07:37,491 Now, to decide on the speed, and we stand ready to support and be part of this 84 00:07:37,593 --> 00:07:43,242 exercise as we proceed. And I think that answers your question. 85 00:07:43,305 --> 00:07:49,465 It answers the question on the Parliament's three-year as well. 86 00:07:49,845 --> 00:07:53,018 We respect the right of the call it is later. 87 00:07:53,085 --> 00:07:56,439 To make up their own opinion and position on what we propose. 88 00:07:56,505 --> 00:08:02,823 But we put on the table a proposal to postpone by one year. 89 00:08:02,925 --> 00:08:06,961 We consider this to be sufficient. To allow the necessary flexibility that we want 90 00:08:07,005 --> 00:08:12,615 to achieve. And then what is needed in the current period. 91 00:08:12,765 --> 00:08:22,292 And therefore, we will engage now with the Parliament and the Council to ensure that 92 00:08:22,403 --> 00:08:30,052 the process. For the proposal that we made, it fully preserved in its essential 93 00:08:30,126 --> 00:08:33,364 scope. And it would not distort it. This is where we are. 94 00:08:33,405 --> 00:08:38,925 But as to the timetable, as to the comments made by the call it is later, as by the 95 00:08:38,985 --> 00:08:43,595 suggestions for the timeline, this is the prerogative of the call it is later. 96 00:08:43,665 --> 00:08:47,369 This is not for us to comment here. These are questions that should be asked to the 97 00:08:47,411 --> 00:08:48,825 Council or to the European Parliament. 98 00:08:50,805 --> 00:08:52,065 Christian, you have a follow-up. 99 00:08:54,405 --> 00:08:57,465 Thanks. Just on the impact of this, because you didn't really answer that question, 100 00:08:57,495 --> 00:08:59,342 I think. So wondering if you've assessed that. 101 00:08:59,385 --> 00:09:01,331 I mean, you said it's sufficient, one year is sufficient. 102 00:09:01,365 --> 00:09:05,519 But did you assess the impact of a longer delay, one year delay, or did you just 103 00:09:05,566 --> 00:09:10,058 take one year on the basis that it can't do too much damage? 104 00:09:10,125 --> 00:09:11,325 Thank you. 105 00:09:11,805 --> 00:09:16,476 You will see when you look at the proposal that we made, there is this kind of 106 00:09:16,622 --> 00:09:25,981 prelude to before the legal. Text. And there is a mention on impact. 107 00:09:26,205 --> 00:09:32,432 Impacts as well. And given that we are not touching the substance or the ambition of 108 00:09:32,486 --> 00:09:39,361 the methane regulation at all with this very, very targeted amendment, this so we're 109 00:09:39,427 --> 00:09:43,857 not changing the substance or the spirit or the objective, at all. 110 00:09:43,965 --> 00:09:50,880 So therefore, there is no further impact assessment now being carried out while the 111 00:09:50,965 --> 00:09:56,455 proposal is with the call it is later. We are not introducing any new requirements 112 00:09:56,505 --> 00:10:00,822 to the member states or the operators with this very, very targeted amendment. 113 00:10:00,885 --> 00:10:04,731 So you will see this language. It is all in the proposal that we made. 114 00:10:04,785 --> 00:10:09,123 So now it's a normal co-decision process. It is now with the call it is later. 115 00:10:09,165 --> 00:10:16,208 And we do not, from the Commission, have any comments to run on the record 116 00:10:16,305 --> 00:10:19,679 commenting the process that is ongoing in the Parliament and in the European 117 00:10:19,717 --> 00:10:20,917 Council. 118 00:10:21,885 --> 00:10:28,245 Okay. And I have one more question. Yes. Nicholas for Anna-Kaisa. 119 00:10:29,025 --> 00:10:32,993 Thank you so much. It's Nicholas for Rapporteur. 120 00:10:33,105 --> 00:10:35,708 You said prerogative of the call it is later to make up their own mind. 121 00:10:35,745 --> 00:10:40,474 It's also the prerogative of the Commission to withdraw the legislation should the 122 00:10:40,561 --> 00:10:45,592 call it is later in. Pose too much bureaucracy, significantly, as you said, distort 123 00:10:45,655 --> 00:10:50,993 the nature of the proposal. Is the Commission recognizing its ability to withdraw 124 00:10:51,045 --> 00:10:52,245 the law? 125 00:10:52,725 --> 00:10:57,911 We don't propose exactly. We don't want to now go to the speculation but I do 126 00:10:57,966 --> 00:11:01,340 appreciate that you consistently ask this question. 127 00:11:01,425 --> 00:11:07,014 Repeatedly, it's good. And our response remains the same, that we have now made the 128 00:11:07,056 --> 00:11:08,769 proposal. It is now with the call it is later. 129 00:11:08,805 --> 00:11:14,607 We work with everybody. And we hope that we will have a solution soon enough to 130 00:11:14,718 --> 00:11:23,264 preserve because ultimately, our main goal and objective is to preserve the 131 00:11:23,333 --> 00:11:27,844 regulation. And that should be also the ultimate goal for the Parliament and the 132 00:11:27,902 --> 00:11:32,500 Council. And we made in this current situation, in this current context, we made a 133 00:11:32,554 --> 00:11:38,859 proposal delay its entry into force by one year, or the certain obligations to enter 134 00:11:38,915 --> 00:11:44,185 into force by one year. So ultimately, this should kind of be the framework now for 135 00:11:44,242 --> 00:11:50,085 everybody. And we work in this context. But we do not make any kind of speculative 136 00:11:50,145 --> 00:11:54,885 football commentary now from the podium what might or might not happen. 137 00:11:56,925 --> 00:12:00,117 We. Absolutely stick to our proposal. Nicholas. 138 00:12:00,165 --> 00:12:01,365 Philip. 139 00:12:01,365 --> 00:12:02,565 Can I just quickly follow up? 140 00:12:04,305 --> 00:12:05,505 Go ahead. 141 00:12:07,905 --> 00:12:11,275 It was previously on this podium that the Commission announced the withdrawal of the 142 00:12:11,312 --> 00:12:15,431 Green Claims Directive when the call it is later exceeded too much, which means that 143 00:12:15,486 --> 00:12:18,126 there is precedent that this can be announced at the podium. 144 00:12:18,165 --> 00:12:24,285 Just wondering whether this would be the place where you could okay, this is 145 00:12:24,333 --> 00:12:27,465 actually extremely speculative, but just like. 146 00:12:27,645 --> 00:12:29,205 Thank you. You answered your own question. 147 00:12:29,565 --> 00:12:33,765 Next. Philip. 148 00:12:36,525 --> 00:12:41,827 Thank you. Philip Bello-Servin with the Norwegian Media Energy Org Klima. 149 00:12:41,985 --> 00:12:46,581 Today, Commissioner Jørgensen presented his implementation report. 150 00:12:46,665 --> 00:12:54,433 And it's not looking very implemented. So to say, because for many files, like the 151 00:12:54,488 --> 00:13:01,393 energy efficiency directive, there are 52 infringement cases for the buildings' 152 00:13:01,464 --> 00:13:04,303 energy performance directive or regulation. 153 00:13:04,365 --> 00:13:14,190 There's only Czechia has satisfactorily implemented the regulation. 154 00:13:14,385 --> 00:13:21,175 And in total, there are 239 infringement cases what. 155 00:13:21,225 --> 00:13:28,731 Is the point of making regulations and directives if they're not implemented? 156 00:13:28,785 --> 00:13:37,918 And will the Commission. Do come up with the change of pace in some sort to tackle 157 00:13:38,025 --> 00:13:47,901 the lack of implementation when everything every major EUCO meeting here seems to 158 00:13:47,985 --> 00:13:51,919 touch on the topic of energy? And at the same time, all these very important energy 159 00:13:51,974 --> 00:13:54,825 files are just not being followed up. 160 00:13:56,085 --> 00:14:03,502 That is a very, very good question that probably would merit an entire seminar to 161 00:14:03,571 --> 00:14:07,087 kind of tackle from a more philosophical point of view, what is the point of 162 00:14:07,125 --> 00:14:09,242 legislation indeed if it's not being implemented? 163 00:14:09,285 --> 00:14:16,274 And this is a question that should go not just to us in the Commission, but also 164 00:14:16,365 --> 00:14:23,865 many, many others. What is the purpose of sort of our goal is not to infringe, not 165 00:14:23,925 --> 00:14:26,909 to pinpoint shortcomings in the member states. 166 00:14:26,985 --> 00:14:34,703 Our approach is always to help and assist member states to be able to implement what 167 00:14:34,818 --> 00:14:40,728 has been agreed. Because what we present from here, what the legislation that we 168 00:14:40,782 --> 00:14:44,518 present, it is adopted jointly with the Parliament and the European Council. 169 00:14:44,565 --> 00:14:51,343 Meaning with the member states. So now, you refer to implementing report with 170 00:14:51,424 --> 00:14:55,083 certain with some energy pieces of energy legislation. 171 00:14:55,125 --> 00:14:59,190 And then obviously, you managed to paint a fairly bleak picture of nothing being 172 00:14:59,242 --> 00:15:03,756 implemented and nobody being on track, which is obviously not the case. 173 00:15:03,825 --> 00:15:12,863 But it is one important tool for us to track progress and to have an understanding 174 00:15:12,928 --> 00:15:20,985 of how our member states are able to keep up and where they see where they clearly 175 00:15:21,090 --> 00:15:26,798 experience challenges is that we have this very regular, very comprehensive 176 00:15:26,865 --> 00:15:33,936 tracking. And reporting. Annually, and sometimes even more often, of their progress. 177 00:15:34,005 --> 00:15:38,219 So even though, yes, you said that what is the purpose of anything? 178 00:15:38,265 --> 00:15:42,733 Because no one's doing nothing. It's not as grim as that. 179 00:15:42,825 --> 00:15:51,105 But it shows that there is also merit to our approach of having regular reporting, 180 00:15:51,155 --> 00:15:55,701 being in contact with member states on a regular basis, having an understanding 181 00:15:55,752 --> 00:15:59,371 where they are meeting challenges, how we can help them. 182 00:15:59,445 --> 00:16:04,028 But I will absolutely not subscribe to kind of what is the purpose of legislating on 183 00:16:04,080 --> 00:16:13,442 anything. Absolutely not. We have been able to reach significant Changes and 184 00:16:13,531 --> 00:16:18,995 improvements as regards energy climate transport, environment, et cetera, by our 185 00:16:19,065 --> 00:16:24,453 legislation. But it is true, yes, given that we have this very comprehensive 186 00:16:24,525 --> 00:16:29,553 tracking and monitoring with our member states, obviously, we are also very 187 00:16:29,610 --> 00:16:32,145 transparent with the shortcomings and challenges. 188 00:16:33,045 --> 00:16:42,037 So if I can just resume and for your question, I would say, first of all, EU 189 00:16:42,119 --> 00:16:47,619 legislation, be it on energy or on any other field, is the result of an agreement 190 00:16:47,685 --> 00:16:52,659 between the Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council with all its member 191 00:16:52,702 --> 00:16:54,725 states represented there. That's the first thing. 192 00:16:54,765 --> 00:17:00,517 And the second, as Anneke has also said, legislation has been a key driver. 193 00:17:00,585 --> 00:17:06,230 And certainly, in the field of energy, in the field of climate, it has been a clear 194 00:17:06,325 --> 00:17:12,045 decisive driver of good, positive change. Philip. 195 00:17:15,525 --> 00:17:21,536 The reason for my question is that some of these files are very central to the Green 196 00:17:21,698 --> 00:17:26,454 Deal, some of these files really legislative. 197 00:17:26,505 --> 00:17:30,552 On areas that are topics of discussion right now. 198 00:17:30,705 --> 00:17:38,838 And seem to be very, very central parts of the EU's politics these past few years. 199 00:17:38,925 --> 00:17:46,412 And the fact that for some of them, no member state has implemented the files seems 200 00:17:46,481 --> 00:17:53,919 to be like an acute issue that would warrant perhaps stronger or more proactive 201 00:17:54,006 --> 00:17:59,735 response. So I'm wondering, are you worried at all about these implementation 202 00:17:59,790 --> 00:18:03,825 figures? And will there be a change of pace in any way? 203 00:18:06,705 --> 00:18:14,206 It really depends a bit what like we have to take a step back and see the bigger 204 00:18:14,260 --> 00:18:18,276 picture and the kind of the longer-term trend. 205 00:18:18,585 --> 00:18:23,515 Of what is it that we are here to do? And what are the objectives that we want to 206 00:18:23,565 --> 00:18:28,917 reach? And where do we where do we clearly have shortcomings? 207 00:18:28,965 --> 00:18:34,234 We have to take into account the context in which member states are implementing and 208 00:18:34,291 --> 00:18:36,829 putting in practice some of this legislation. 209 00:18:36,885 --> 00:18:41,694 And as I said, I mean, the projections that we make for example, to reach the 210 00:18:41,777 --> 00:18:46,967 climate neutrality by 2050 or cutting emissions by 90%, et cetera, et cetera, these 211 00:18:47,052 --> 00:18:52,385 are all based on our calculation that there will be a full implementation of our 212 00:18:52,439 --> 00:18:58,351 legislation. So of course, we the starting point is that when we legislate, and when 213 00:18:58,432 --> 00:19:03,831 we jointly agree on something with our member states and the Parliament, it will be 214 00:19:03,901 --> 00:19:09,262 then done. But then at the same time, we are especially in the field of energy, and 215 00:19:09,314 --> 00:19:13,386 especially as regards energy legislation, it is at the same time a very, very 216 00:19:13,440 --> 00:19:17,841 challenging context in which our member states are putting in place and implementing 217 00:19:17,914 --> 00:19:22,900 some of these laws. The past five years, I mean, this is the second massive energy 218 00:19:22,998 --> 00:19:26,550 crisis which is putting a huge strain on member states. 219 00:19:26,625 --> 00:19:34,390 So therefore, it is still it has merit that we have a very, very transparent 220 00:19:34,605 --> 00:19:39,124 granular. System of having this exchange with our member states. 221 00:19:39,165 --> 00:19:43,536 Because that help us helps us understand that where are the shortcomings? 222 00:19:43,605 --> 00:19:49,591 Is there something can we give some flexibility within the legislation? 223 00:19:49,725 --> 00:19:55,015 Is there something that has to be done? Or is this a systemic thing? 224 00:19:55,125 --> 00:20:00,693 And this is some of the examples. The methane, one year, is one example. 225 00:20:00,765 --> 00:20:03,879 Our member states, the majority of our member states, got in touch with us and said 226 00:20:03,912 --> 00:20:06,029 that is there something you can do about this? 227 00:20:06,105 --> 00:20:14,997 And we did. So while we don't operate in a vacuum either, but I would not draw too 228 00:20:15,081 --> 00:20:20,981 dramatic conclusions based on an implementing report that focuses on certain type of 229 00:20:21,045 --> 00:20:25,885 legislation. It is just a snapshot of a specific area. 230 00:20:26,025 --> 00:20:30,705 But it shows that we take implementation very seriously. 231 00:20:30,885 --> 00:20:35,415 This is why we do these reports. And this is why we make these reports public as 232 00:20:35,465 --> 00:20:37,065 well, for everybody else to see. 233 00:20:37,965 --> 00:20:42,473 And in the meantime, we're not just acknowledging the results of this reports. 234 00:20:42,525 --> 00:20:48,586 We have a number of groups with the member states dedicated to accompany the 235 00:20:48,653 --> 00:20:53,991 implementation, the transposition in each member state on a number of pieces of 236 00:20:54,105 --> 00:20:59,334 legislation. On energy efficiency, on renewables, where we sit and discuss in detail 237 00:20:59,385 --> 00:21:03,722 how to go about this. And this report helps us precisely see as Anneke has said, 238 00:21:03,774 --> 00:21:11,681 where are the biggest challenges. Any other questions for Anneke as of today? 239 00:21:11,805 --> 00:21:18,775 I see Hank Jakob. Is it for Anneke? No, but I gave you the floor. 240 00:21:18,825 --> 00:21:20,025 Go ahead. 241 00:21:24,885 --> 00:21:30,405 Hi. Thank you. It's a question about the car deal negotiated by Volkswagen with the 242 00:21:30,465 --> 00:21:35,971 US government and that apparently will also apply to all other German car makers. 243 00:21:36,045 --> 00:21:41,003 My question is, is the Commission informed about these negotiations that were done 244 00:21:41,057 --> 00:21:46,169 by the CEOs of German car companies with the US government to lower the effective 245 00:21:46,254 --> 00:21:51,909 tariff rate of the US on German cars? And do you have any comments on that, on those 246 00:21:51,980 --> 00:21:56,854 deals that will basically mean that they get lower tariffs if they produce more in 247 00:21:56,929 --> 00:22:00,285 the US, leading to jobs moving from Europe to the US? 248 00:22:02,985 --> 00:22:07,796 Thank you, Jakob. I think I saw some reporting in that sense. 249 00:22:07,845 --> 00:22:11,503 Indeed, we do not have comments to offer at this stage. 250 00:22:11,565 --> 00:22:19,510 But we'll get back to you on this. Other questions? 251 00:22:19,725 --> 00:22:20,925 Yes, please. 252 00:22:22,245 --> 00:22:26,798 Um. One question regarding the social media guidelines. 253 00:22:26,865 --> 00:22:33,266 As the EU Kids Act in Austria, there's quite an uproar since yesterday about the 254 00:22:33,323 --> 00:22:41,394 decision of the Commission. So yesterday, I thought Vice Chancellor Babler and State 255 00:22:41,469 --> 00:22:49,794 Secretary Pröll called the Commission for taking action and for making a solution 256 00:22:49,903 --> 00:22:53,387 until March 27. Do you think that's realistic? 257 00:22:53,445 --> 00:23:00,801 And could you give us maybe kind of like a roadmap for the following months for EU 258 00:23:00,885 --> 00:23:02,085 Kids Act? 259 00:23:04,425 --> 00:23:05,865 Thank you. Good afternoon. 260 00:23:06,225 --> 00:23:10,339 So first, one point to be extremely clear. 261 00:23:10,425 --> 00:23:15,477 The message goes to all member states. We now need to focus on the negotiations of 262 00:23:15,525 --> 00:23:20,277 the Kids Act. This is the top priority not to fragment the market and to protect all 263 00:23:20,335 --> 00:23:23,575 kids. I think the Commission was extremely clear on this. 264 00:23:23,685 --> 00:23:27,363 And this is where we're accounting definitely on member states who already advanced 265 00:23:27,417 --> 00:23:32,145 the work at national level. And who have come up with potential solutions like 266 00:23:32,205 --> 00:23:35,925 Austria to lead this process, to help us to advance this work. 267 00:23:35,985 --> 00:23:40,715 I mean, it's a very ambitious timeline. I can agree that we have indeed received a 268 00:23:40,780 --> 00:23:46,108 letter from the Austrian side, you're right, where this tentative agenda of March 269 00:23:46,271 --> 00:23:52,212 2027 has been raised with us. We are all in favor of an ambitious agenda for our 270 00:23:52,264 --> 00:23:56,781 Kids Act. So let's work hand in hand with all our member states to get this over the 271 00:23:56,835 --> 00:23:58,035 line as quickly as possible. 272 00:23:59,205 --> 00:24:04,965 Thank you. You have a follow-up? Yeah. Go ahead. 273 00:24:05,445 --> 00:24:13,237 Yeah, also in this letter, it's written that if otherwise the negotiations come not 274 00:24:13,334 --> 00:24:24,358 to a solution until March 27, Austria will taking take action again for. 275 00:24:24,585 --> 00:24:28,725 Proposing national solutions. So what's your position on that? 276 00:24:31,725 --> 00:24:38,293 I'm an optimist. I mean, we have clear evidence at our disposal that shows how much 277 00:24:38,352 --> 00:24:42,635 damage is being done by online social media platforms, our kids on a daily basis. 278 00:24:42,705 --> 00:24:48,236 We have seen indeed several member states, including Austria, who have come out with 279 00:24:48,301 --> 00:24:53,952 potential national measures. We have come up with a harmonized EU-wide proposal. 280 00:24:54,045 --> 00:25:00,510 So I do believe that we have a lot of and a strong push from everywhere across 281 00:25:00,585 --> 00:25:04,728 Europe to get a deal over the line as quickly as possible. 282 00:25:04,785 --> 00:25:08,778 So I will not prejudge what may happen or not after March. 283 00:25:08,865 --> 00:25:13,293 We have now come forward with a postponement for 12 months. 284 00:25:13,425 --> 00:25:17,209 Let us use these 12 months to preserve the work of our co-legislators. 285 00:25:17,265 --> 00:25:22,136 Let's work hand in hand with Austria. So this is absolutely nothing against Austria. 286 00:25:22,185 --> 00:25:26,462 This is work together with Austria and all member states to advance the work on the 287 00:25:26,505 --> 00:25:27,705 Kids Act. 288 00:25:28,305 --> 00:25:33,838 Thank you, Thomas. Other questions for Thomas? 289 00:25:34,005 --> 00:25:39,562 Does not seem to be the case. Other topics today here in the room? 290 00:25:39,645 --> 00:25:40,845 Jorge? 291 00:25:42,885 --> 00:25:50,352 Hello, Paula. Sorry. Hello, Paula. There are currently seven ships going from Russia 292 00:25:50,435 --> 00:25:54,465 to the US, carrying diesel under the Trump-Putin deal. 293 00:25:54,585 --> 00:25:58,638 It appears that several of these ships are actually of European origin. 294 00:25:58,725 --> 00:26:03,991 We have seen that US senators are warning these ships to go back because they say 295 00:26:04,043 --> 00:26:08,349 the sanctions waiver does not overrule US Congress. 296 00:26:08,445 --> 00:26:12,710 Do you have any position on this matter? What's your advice to these vessels? 297 00:26:12,765 --> 00:26:15,173 Should they go back or should they keep going? 298 00:26:15,225 --> 00:26:16,425 Thank you. 299 00:26:17,685 --> 00:26:23,433 I. My advice in this case does not really matter. 300 00:26:23,565 --> 00:26:25,968 What matters is the position that we have. 301 00:26:26,025 --> 00:26:31,001 On this topic and which we set out very clearly from the beginning. 302 00:26:31,065 --> 00:26:37,261 You know what the position is. There are sanctions in place. 303 00:26:37,365 --> 00:26:45,061 Supported by the EU when it comes to the exports of oil and oil products from 304 00:26:45,160 --> 00:26:50,892 Russia. They're subject to sanctions. They're subject to an oil price cap. 305 00:26:51,045 --> 00:27:03,338 And we stick to those sanctions. And the less that can be promoted in terms of those 306 00:27:03,445 --> 00:27:10,185 exports, the better. Other questions? David? 307 00:27:15,765 --> 00:27:21,060 Thank you, Paula. David Price, your democracy and human info. 308 00:27:21,225 --> 00:27:29,731 I want to come back to the question of the Canada and the associate membership or 309 00:27:29,841 --> 00:27:36,114 associate agreement. The Commission is the guardian of the treaties. 310 00:27:36,165 --> 00:27:43,291 And there was a very elegant solution which was for association which was made in 311 00:27:43,365 --> 00:27:48,186 1950s with the European Community. And United Kingdom. 312 00:27:48,285 --> 00:27:56,181 And it lasted for a couple of decades. Before European Community European Kingdom 313 00:27:56,265 --> 00:28:03,705 became a member. So I'm wondering whether this solution which was to create a 314 00:28:04,725 --> 00:28:14,107 association. Council which was tied to the European Commission or high community 315 00:28:14,183 --> 00:28:18,133 high authorities was then has been considered. 316 00:28:18,225 --> 00:28:23,442 Because it's a very short treaty of 15 articles. 317 00:28:23,565 --> 00:28:28,455 It created a standing committee with four members from each side. 318 00:28:28,545 --> 00:28:36,562 And discussed and exchanged information on a number of topics of great importance to 319 00:28:36,623 --> 00:28:46,676 all of them. And included for example consumer Consumer issues. 320 00:28:46,965 --> 00:28:53,662 What discussion has taken place inside the Commission relative to this precedent for 321 00:28:53,754 --> 00:29:02,251 creating associations with external Bodies and countries? 322 00:29:02,325 --> 00:29:05,781 And has anything been taken forward on it? 323 00:29:05,865 --> 00:29:10,240 The Commission, as I say, is the guardian of the of the treaties. 324 00:29:10,305 --> 00:29:15,225 And this was probably one of the first that was ever made. 325 00:29:15,945 --> 00:29:23,145 David, if my memory serves me correctly, that agreement that you're referring to in 326 00:29:23,245 --> 00:29:28,277 the 50s with UK was with the Coal and Steel Community. 327 00:29:28,365 --> 00:29:40,080 So based on a different treaty. And we do not really have the same type of of. 328 00:29:40,185 --> 00:29:46,137 Mechanism that is foreseen in the current treaty for the European Union. 329 00:29:46,245 --> 00:29:51,756 So I cannot say that this has been the basis or inspiration for what is being 330 00:29:51,834 --> 00:29:57,928 discussed and flagged today. And today indeed when we speak of Canada, when we speak 331 00:29:57,995 --> 00:30:05,254 of never closer relation with Canada, which stops short of full membership because 332 00:30:05,325 --> 00:30:11,480 also based on the treaty Canada cannot become an EU member state, we are looking 333 00:30:11,579 --> 00:30:16,027 into really bringing Canada closer to the EU. 334 00:30:16,125 --> 00:30:24,019 Closer than any other non-EU country. Closer than anything we have done before. 335 00:30:24,105 --> 00:30:28,937 In terms of closer alignment and cooperation on policies, on programs, on 336 00:30:29,013 --> 00:30:39,545 governance. And I invite you to also read the speech from the President yesterday in 337 00:30:39,645 --> 00:30:48,228 Canada, where she also elaborates on what this closer ever closer relation with 338 00:30:48,325 --> 00:30:52,911 Canada entails. And gives concrete examples. 339 00:30:53,025 --> 00:31:05,582 And Reminds that it is time to work on new frontiers together which. 340 00:31:05,625 --> 00:31:14,125 Is very much inspired on what Germany wrote when he came back from Canada himself. 341 00:31:14,265 --> 00:31:22,485 At the beginning of the 20th century. Yes, David? 342 00:31:26,565 --> 00:31:35,685 Yeah. The idea of geography is a bit of a red herring because part of Canada is also 343 00:31:36,105 --> 00:31:40,298 part of the illegal sovereignty of the European Union, which is 344 00:31:40,365 --> 00:31:47,877 Saint-Pierre-Miquelon so the geography was not considered as part of the way to 345 00:31:47,979 --> 00:31:55,132 discuss this problem. And it was discussed on the basis of European human rights 346 00:31:55,201 --> 00:31:58,470 law. And specifically the Council of Europe Human Rights Law. 347 00:31:58,545 --> 00:32:05,292 So I wonder whether those principles can be have been discussed because it's 348 00:32:05,343 --> 00:32:09,174 extraordinary that you people talking about geography and geography has got nothing 349 00:32:09,216 --> 00:32:14,870 to do with it. Cyprus was considered to be part of Asia before it joined. 350 00:32:14,985 --> 00:32:22,220 And part of the sovereignty of the European Union is worldwide basically. 351 00:32:22,305 --> 00:32:25,305 Including South America Canada. 352 00:32:26,085 --> 00:32:33,056 And North America and Asia and so on. So I wonder whether the basic principles of 353 00:32:33,150 --> 00:32:36,225 that first association agreement. 354 00:32:40,883 --> 00:32:44,976 Should be looked at more carefully. It sounds like you haven't actually considered 355 00:32:45,023 --> 00:32:46,223 it. 356 00:32:47,063 --> 00:32:53,640 Um, David, thank you. And without entering into discussions on geography, I can 357 00:32:53,712 --> 00:32:59,243 assure you, and confirm, that it's really precisely based on principles and very 358 00:32:59,303 --> 00:33:04,047 solid principles and values that we share with Canada, that we are having this 359 00:33:04,130 --> 00:33:09,732 discussion for an ever closer relation. And those principles are also being 360 00:33:09,788 --> 00:33:17,198 reiterated, recalled, by the leaders the three leaders present in Montréal today, 361 00:33:17,251 --> 00:33:22,684 and we will have the occasion to hear more from President von der Leyen on this at 362 00:33:22,746 --> 00:33:27,203 the joint press conference this afternoon. 363 00:33:27,323 --> 00:33:32,903 I have Pierre Benazir online. 364 00:33:37,523 --> 00:33:38,363 Yes, I have a question. 365 00:33:38,363 --> 00:33:39,563 for Anouar. 366 00:33:40,283 --> 00:33:41,483 Yes, go ahead. 367 00:33:43,043 --> 00:33:49,198 Er, the Algerian Parliament has announced the deployment of troops and military 368 00:33:49,292 --> 00:33:54,622 resources to Niger. Just as the recommendations of the European Union's 369 00:33:54,667 --> 00:34:00,633 Representative for the Sahel, Mr Cravigny, seem have been heeded, since the Nigerien 370 00:34:00,696 --> 00:34:04,497 diplomat presented his letters of credence this month. 371 00:34:04,577 --> 00:34:09,460 I would like to know where relations between the European Union and Niger stand, and 372 00:34:09,524 --> 00:34:13,583 whether there is any comment on this Algerian military deployment in the Sahel. 373 00:34:16,883 --> 00:34:18,083 Wait, Anouar. 374 00:34:18,323 --> 00:34:21,442 Thank you, thank you Pierre for your question. 375 00:34:21,501 --> 00:34:25,549 We have indeed taken note, and acknowledged the information according to which, at 376 00:34:25,600 --> 00:34:30,618 the initiative of President Tebboune, the Algerian Parliament has approved the 377 00:34:30,713 --> 00:34:33,419 deployment of Algerian army units in Niger. 378 00:34:33,473 --> 00:34:37,660 We are closely monitoring the situation and seeking further clarification on its 379 00:34:37,717 --> 00:34:42,839 scope and objective, as well as basis of this reported deployment. 380 00:34:42,890 --> 00:34:47,382 As the European Union, we reaffirm our support for efforts that contribute to peace, 381 00:34:47,447 --> 00:34:52,337 stability and security in the Sahel, and this in full respect of international law, 382 00:34:52,384 --> 00:34:56,103 the sovereignty of States and the protection of civilians. 383 00:34:56,146 --> 00:35:00,673 I will also recall that any security measure should be transparent, proportionate 384 00:35:00,762 --> 00:35:06,257 and conducive to regional de-escalation as well as to long-term stability. 385 00:35:06,317 --> 00:35:10,450 We, for our part, remain in contact with the relevant partners and continue to 386 00:35:10,507 --> 00:35:14,766 support peaceful, effective and sustainable solutions to the region's security 387 00:35:14,852 --> 00:35:16,052 problems. 388 00:35:17,963 --> 00:35:27,338 Thank you. Anouar. Any other questions for Anouar? 389 00:35:27,444 --> 00:35:29,903 That is not the case. Any other questions? 390 00:35:32,243 --> 00:35:33,443 Yes, please. 391 00:35:34,583 --> 00:35:38,329 So, Niklas Pichler, Austrian press agency again. 392 00:35:38,543 --> 00:35:42,860 A question regarding the special taxes in Hungary. 393 00:35:42,983 --> 00:35:52,178 Yesterday we heard about a letter concerning the special taxes from Spa CEO Hans K. 394 00:35:52,283 --> 00:35:58,661 Reich to the Commission. Could you confirm already receiving this letter, and what's 395 00:35:58,718 --> 00:36:00,503 your position to this letter? 396 00:36:01,643 --> 00:36:06,729 Thank you. Indeed, we looked into it following your question yesterday. 397 00:36:06,803 --> 00:36:08,543 And Louise. 398 00:36:08,843 --> 00:36:09,143 Yes? 399 00:36:09,143 --> 00:36:10,343 What can we say today? 400 00:36:10,943 --> 00:36:15,033 Hi, yes, thank you for your question. So indeed we can now confirm that we have 401 00:36:15,083 --> 00:36:20,337 received the letter from the CEO of the Spa-Austria group. 402 00:36:20,483 --> 00:36:26,465 We're assessing its content for now, and just to specify as well, and give a bit of 403 00:36:26,527 --> 00:36:32,873 context, on this retail tax regime in Hungary, there's an ongoing infringement 404 00:36:32,961 --> 00:36:38,080 procedure. So the European Commission decided to refer Hungary to the Court of 405 00:36:38,145 --> 00:36:44,881 Justice in April 2026. In the meantime, Hungary adopted legislation in summer 2026 406 00:36:44,963 --> 00:36:49,368 to abolish the discriminatory aspects of the retail tax regime. 407 00:36:49,463 --> 00:36:54,813 We are still assessing this legislation, and its effect for foreign retail companies 408 00:36:54,863 --> 00:37:00,310 in Hungary. So for now, we're in contact with the Hungarian authorities and we will 409 00:37:00,378 --> 00:37:01,943 consider possible next steps. 410 00:37:03,563 --> 00:37:13,313 Okay. Good. Other questions to Louise who is also stepping in for Maciej today? 411 00:37:13,523 --> 00:37:18,623 No? Then we go again online. Momchil. 412 00:37:24,803 --> 00:37:31,484 Good afternoon. There is very a very sad news from Russia just came. 413 00:37:31,583 --> 00:37:39,019 One the newspaper Novaya Gazeta which was directed by the famous journalist Dmitry 414 00:37:39,128 --> 00:37:44,693 Muratov who was also Nobel laureate announced that it's closing. 415 00:37:44,783 --> 00:37:48,863 Is the Commission aware of this and what it's what is its command? 416 00:37:50,363 --> 00:37:54,717 Thank you, Momchil. I was personally not aware. 417 00:37:54,803 --> 00:38:00,513 I'm looking at the team we do not have a reaction at this stage on that. 418 00:38:00,563 --> 00:38:02,183 We'll look into it and get back to you. 419 00:38:03,443 --> 00:38:04,283 Thank you. 420 00:38:04,283 --> 00:38:12,263 Thank you. Other questions for us today? It's yes, there you go. 421 00:38:15,143 --> 00:38:17,953 Thank you, Viber Vlainić, Croatian Radio Television. 422 00:38:18,023 --> 00:38:22,679 I want to ask something about planned negotiations between Russia, Ukraine, and the 423 00:38:22,742 --> 00:38:29,386 United States. So the Kremlin spokesperson just said that at some stage the 424 00:38:29,460 --> 00:38:37,691 participation of European representatives will be necessary, will be will be needed. 425 00:38:37,763 --> 00:38:43,333 So is the Commission preparing for that stage of the negotiations? 426 00:38:43,403 --> 00:38:46,463 Is it prepared to send someone to negotiate? 427 00:38:48,263 --> 00:38:53,293 Of course we are prepared, and we have been preparing for a long time. 428 00:38:53,423 --> 00:38:57,420 And we just are looking forward to the moment. 429 00:38:57,503 --> 00:39:04,720 Where indeed Russia will be ready to engage in real discussions and in real terms to 430 00:39:04,823 --> 00:39:11,932 put an end to this war. Any other questions? 431 00:39:12,083 --> 00:39:18,035 Not today, so we wish you a good hopefully also long weekend. 432 00:39:18,124 --> 00:39:20,783 And wish you a good afternoon.